Anthropic study finds men use AI coding agents more than twice as often as women in social science research
2x gap. Men use AI coding agents twice as often as women in research—and nobody's talking about why.
Why it matters
Anthropic's research reveals a significant gender disparity in AI coding agent adoption among researchers, raising questions about accessibility, awareness, and potential structural barriers in how AI tools are distributed and adopted across disciplines.
The key facts
12 to knowResearchers with male-coded names use coding agents 2x+ more than female-coded names
Gender gap persists even within same discipline and career level
Economists lead adoption at 39%
Education researchers at just 4% adoption
Gender gap for coding agents is wider than for general AI use
Study conducted by Anthropic researchers
Findings span social science research community
Men use coding agents 2x+ more often than women (name-based analysis)
Education researchers lag at 4%
Gender gap in coding agents wider than gap in general AI use
Study controlled for discipline and career level
Source: Anthropic research
Go to the source
The Decoderthe-decoder.com
Publisher excerpt: Researchers with typically male names use coding agents more than twice as often as those with typically female names, even within the same discipline and career level, according to an Anthropic study. Economists lead at 39 percent, while education researchers sit at just four percent. The gender…
