WorkThe story, in brief

Code Ninjas: The AI-In-Education Problem Isn’t Cheating. It’s Passivity.

Nobody is talking about AI in education the right way. It's not cheating. It's passivity.

Illustration of two anonymous hands arranging task cards around an amber tool on a shared desk.
People, judgement and the changing nature of work.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

As AI tools proliferate in classrooms, industry leaders are reframing the debate from academic integrity concerns to deeper questions about active learning and student engagement—a critical policy and cultural discussion for institutions designing AI-integrated curricula.

The key facts

6 to know
  1. Code Ninjas CEO Navin Gurnaney frames AI-in-education risk as passivity, not cheating

  2. Published May 2026 in Forbes

  3. Commentary-driven perspective on AI's societal/educational impact

  4. Code Ninjas CEO identifies passivity, not cheating, as primary AI-in-education risk

  5. Challenges prevailing narrative on AI + education policy

  6. Suggests need for new frameworks around AI tool deployment in learning

Go to the source

Forbes Innovationforbes.com

Publisher excerpt: AI in education is a problem, says Code Ninjas CEO Navin Gurnaney. But it's not cheating. Rather, it's passivity.
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore work news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Work