How we’re responding to The New York Times’ data demands in order to protect user privacy
OpenAI is fighting a court order to retain user data indefinitely. Here's what that means for AI company liability.

Why it matters
A major AI company is publicly challenging legal demands for indefinite data retention, signaling a broader clash between regulatory/litigation pressure and AI industry data practices. This sets precedent for how AI labs will handle privacy obligations under legal scrutiny.
The key facts
5 to knowOpenAI fighting court order from New York Times lawsuit
Dispute centers on indefinite retention of ChatGPT and API user data
Company prioritizing user privacy protections in legal response
Published June 5, 2025 — suggests active ongoing litigation
Broader implications for AI company data governance and legal liability
Go to the source
OpenAI Blogopenai.com
Publisher excerpt: OpenAI is fighting a court order at the demands of The New York Times and plaintiffs, which involves retention of consumer ChatGPT and API user data indefinitely. Learn how we’re working to uphold user privacy, address legal requirements, and stay true to our data protection commitments.
