Import AI 456: RSI and economic growth; radical optionality for AI regulation; and a neural computer
Nobody is talking about the third way. Regulation or deregulation is a false choice — here's what radical optionality actually means for AI governance.
Why it matters
As regulation debates pit innovation against safety, a new framework suggests governments should build crisis-response capabilities now rather than choose between heavy-handed rules or a free-for-all. This reframes how companies should think about compliance strategy.
The key facts
10 to knowConcept of 'radical optionality' in AI regulation introduced
Framework argues for government investment in future crisis tools
Article date: May 11, 2026
Content appears truncated — full details unavailable
Topics span RSI (Responsible Scale-up Index), economic growth, and neural computing
Concept: 'Radical optionality' in AI regulation
Focus: Government preparedness and tool-building for future AI crises
Source: Institute researchers (specific institution not fully shown in excerpt)
Also covered: RSI economic growth impact, neural computer research
Newsletter format with multiple research topics bundled
Go to the source
Import AI (Blog)jack-clark.net
Publisher excerpt: Welcome to Import AI, a newsletter about AI research. Import AI runs on arXiv, cappuccinos, and feedback from readers. If you’d like to support this, please subscribe. Subscribe now Regulate? Don’t regulate. There’s a third way: Radical Optionality:…Governments should invest in the tools now that…