FrontierThe story, in brief

Mathematicians want proof OpenAI didn’t use their work

OpenAI faces a second accusation: did it train on unpublished mathematics without permission? The transparency row is heating up.

Illustration of a transparent lens revealing connected networks across layers of paper.
Exploring the next frontier of AI research.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

Training data provenance and ethics are becoming a flashpoint in the frontier labs. If OpenAI used unpublished researcher work without disclosure, it raises questions about the legitimacy of capability claims and sets precedent for how labs must handle academic collaboration.

The key facts

6 to know
  1. Second mathematician (Andreas Thom) publicly challenges OpenAI over training data sources

  2. Accusation: unpublished work may have contributed to ChatGPT's mathematical capabilities

  3. Broader row over OpenAI's transparency regarding training data origins

  4. Ethical and 'dishonest' behavior alleged by researcher community

  5. Follows earlier dispute over similar concerns

  6. Relates to OpenAI's 'increasingly impressive' mathematical discovery announcements

Go to the source

The Verge AItheverge.com

Publisher excerpt: Another researcher is challenging OpenAI about the data driving its increasingly impressive array of mathematical discoveries. Just days after a bitter row erupted over whether the company's models benefited from unpublished work, a second mathematician has come forward accusing the AI giant of…
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore frontier news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Frontier