FrontierThe story, in brief
Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms GLM-5.2 in coding and costs slightly less
51 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 just beat GLM-5.2 on coding—and costs less.
The KeyNews take
Why it matters
Meta's incremental model update demonstrates measurable capability gains and cost efficiency improvements in the competitive coding LLM space, signaling continued progress in narrowing gaps with frontier models.
The key facts
4 to knowMuse Spark 1.1 scored 51 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (+8 points in 3 months)
Coding benchmark: 71.3 score, outperforming GLM-5.2
Cost: $0.26 per task (lower than GLM-5.2)
Hallucination rate reduced from 73% to 38%
Go to the source
The Decoderthe-decoder.com
Publisher excerpt: Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 scored 51 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up eight points in three months. In coding, it edges past GLM-5.2 with a score of 71.3 at a lower cost of $0.26 per task. The hallucination rate dropped from 73 to 38 percent.