WorkThe story, in brief

More than 1 in 10 chance AI ‘could kill all humans,’ says Anthropic safety lead after colleague quits

A safety researcher just quit Anthropic over uncontrolled AI risk—and his colleague put a number on extinction: >10%. Here's what that means for the industry.

Illustration of two anonymous hands arranging task cards around an amber tool on a shared desk.
People, judgement and the changing nature of work.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

High-profile safety defection and public extinction-risk quantification signal deepening internal disagreement at a frontier lab over deployment velocity versus existential precaution. This shapes how practitioners and enterprises evaluate AI vendor trustworthiness and governance posture.

The key facts

5 to know
  1. Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic citing lax safety approach

  2. Coxon previously trained systems at OpenAI; now accuses both labs of 'racing straight to self-improving superintelligence'

  3. Anthropic safety lead cited >10% extinction probability by end of decade

  4. Departure framed as disagreement over governance and control of 'superhuman systems'

  5. Published Sep 9, 2026 — high-profile personnel move with policy/safety implications

Go to the source

The Verge AItheverge.com

Publisher excerpt: A senior Anthropic safety researcher has said there is more than a 10 percent chance artificial intelligence "could kill all humans" by the end of the decade, just hours after a colleague resigned over fears the AI lab and its rivals are carelessly racing to build "superhuman systems" they cannot…
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore work news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Work