WorkThe story, in brief

Musk’s Legal Expert Says OpenAI Foundation Should Have “A Lot More” Than $200 Billion

Musk's lawsuit just escalated. A Columbia Law dean testified OpenAI's nonprofit structure violates tax law — with $200B+ at stake.

Illustration of two anonymous hands arranging task cards around an amber tool on a shared desk.
People, judgement and the changing nature of work.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

Musk's legal challenge to OpenAI's nonprofit-to-for-profit transition is entering substantive testimony phase with expert validation of structural violations. This could reshape how AI companies organize their governance and cap tables.

The key facts

10 to know
  1. David Schizer (Columbia Law dean 2004-2014, tax/nonprofit law expert) testified for Musk's case

  2. Testimony claims OpenAI foundation should hold significantly more than $200B in assets

  3. Core allegation: OpenAI acted inconsistently with nonprofit customs and tax law compliance

  4. Case centers on OpenAI's for-profit subsidiary structure and nonprofit governance transition

  5. Published May 8, 2026 — ongoing litigation with escalating expert testimony

  6. David Schizer (former Columbia Law dean, tax/nonprofit specialist) testifying for Musk

  7. Testimony centers on OpenAI's alleged deviation from nonprofit customs

  8. $200 billion valuation referenced in dispute over foundation asset adequacy

  9. Lawsuit focuses on structural inconsistency between nonprofit status and for-profit operations

  10. May 2026 hearing date

Go to the source

The Informationtheinformation.com

Publisher excerpt: Elon Musk’s team called the former dean of Columbia Law School to testify Thursday in his lawsuit against OpenAI that the ChatGPT maker acted in several ways inconsistent with nonprofit customs. David Schizer, who served as dean from 2004 to 2014 and specializes in tax and nonprofit law, ...
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore work news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Work