WorkThe story, in brief

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: From Principles to Practice

Evaluation debt is silently breaking production AI systems at scale. Here's how Twitter, Walmart, and Netflix are fixing it.

Illustration of two anonymous hands arranging task cards around an amber tool on a shared desk.
People, judgement and the changing nature of work.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

As AI adoption moves from pilots to production, engineering leaders are discovering that traditional metrics mask semantic failures. This presentation offers a diagnostic framework for eliminating evaluation debt—a critical governance gap that could determine whether enterprise AI investments deliver ROI or fail silently.

The key facts

11 to know
  1. Evaluation debt identified as hidden risk in production AI systems

  2. Five-layer evaluation stack framework spanning infrastructure and UX

  3. Traditional metrics fail to catch silent semantic failures in modern architectures

  4. Diagnostic maturity model for engineering leaders

  5. Case studies from Twitter, Walmart, Netflix

  6. Focus on evaluation governance and operational risk mitigation

  7. Five-layer evaluation stack framework (infrastructure to UX)

  8. Evaluation debt identified as production risk across Twitter, Walmart, Netflix

  9. Traditional metrics identified as inadequate for modern architectures

  10. Diagnostic maturity model for engineering leaders provided

  11. Focus on silent semantic failures in deployed systems

Go to the source

InfoQ AI/MLinfoq.com

Publisher excerpt: Mallika Rao discusses the hidden risk of evaluation debt in production AI systems, drawing on her experience at Twitter, Walmart, and Netflix. She explains why traditional metrics fail modern architectures, breaks down a five-layer evaluation stack spanning infrastructure and UX, and shares a…
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore work news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Work