Scientists Asked AI to Impersonate 112 Public Figures. What Happened Next Is a ‘Dire’ Warning
People trust AI impersonators more than real politicians. A new study shows why that's a problem for democracy.

Why it matters
Academic research reveals a critical vulnerability in public discourse: AI-generated political personas are perceived as more authentic and coherent than actual public figures, creating a blueprint for coordinated disinformation campaigns at scale.
The key facts
4 to knowStudy tested AI impersonations of 112 public figures
Finding: AI versions rated higher on authenticity, coherence, and relevance than originals
Researchers flagged potential for systematic public deception
Raises governance/trust implications for political communication
Go to the source
404 Media404media.co
Publisher excerpt: Researchers discovered that people found AI impersonators to be more authentic, coherent, and relevant than the real politicians, raising alarm bells around the potential for public deception.