WorkThe story, in brief

The AI transformation underway at Musinsa

Not a pilot. Musinsa rebuilt its entire AI adoption model around field-driven problem-solving — and cut implementation costs to a third.

Illustration of two anonymous hands arranging task cards around an amber tool on a shared desk.
People, judgement and the changing nature of work.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

Musinsa's case study shows how enterprises can democratize AI adoption by having domain experts (not just engineers) define and solve their own workflows, with rigorous ROI tracking and token management. The model trades traditional top-down vendor solutions for bottom-up experimentation, accelerating time-to-value and building organizational AI literacy.

The key facts

19 to know
  1. Musinsa's 29CM AI chat agent handles ~25% of all customer inquiries

  2. In-house AI chat agent development cost reduced to ~one-third of outsourced approach

  3. Development timeline was ~one-quarter of similar projects at other companies

  4. Product registration process: AI now auto-infers categories, colors, materials (previously manual)

  5. Example quantified goal: reducing repetitive tasks from 270 man-hours/week to 3 man-hours/week using LLMs

  6. Five-year TCO calculated before implementation to determine investment payback timeline

  7. Monthly post-launch tracking: cost variance, inquiry processing rates, performance vs. targets

  8. Token usage actively monitored by leaders using separate tools to prevent waste while encouraging adoption

  9. Field teams directly propose AI improvements; engineers provide guidance until targets are met through testing

  10. Leadership culture: C-suite and many leaders experiment with AI first and share results to drive adoption

  11. 29CM AI chat agent handles ~25% of customer inquiries (quantified adoption metric)

  12. In-house agent development reduced costs to ~33% of outsourced method; development period ~25% of peer projects

  13. Product registration process now auto-infers categories, colors, materials via AI (automation ROI example)

  14. Visual AI goal: elevate to top standard by H1 2027 (timeline commitment)

  15. Five-year TCO calculation and monthly tracking of cost vs. performance targets (financial discipline)

  16. Token usage actively monitored; leaders review consumption against task efficiency (cost discipline)

  17. Problem-definition ability prioritized over AI proficiency in hiring (talent model shift)

  18. Field teams propose AI improvements directly; engineers provide guides, not scripts (deployment method)

  19. Quantitative goals set (e.g., reduce 270 man-hours/week to 3) before implementation (ROI pre-commitment)

Go to the source

CIOcio.com

Publisher excerpt: For many years, Musinsa, South Korea’s premier online fashion platform and marketplace for Korean designer brands, streetwear, and beauty products, has described itself as a company dedicated to AI. They bring in AI-native talent and give employees room to experiment, yet meticulously manage token…
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore work news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Work