ToolsThe story, in brief

The company that made open weights mainstream now competes on discounts

Meta's new coding agent undercuts the market at 20¢ per million tokens—but there's a catch.

Paper-cut illustration of a coral software window opening into a three-dimensional drafting space.
New tools for building and creating with AI.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

Meta is shifting from open-weight leadership to competing on price and developer experience (with Muse Code, a crash-resilient coding agent). The data-sharing tier reveals a new tradeoff in the commoditizing LLM market: cheaper access for training consent.

The key facts

12 to know
  1. Meta released Muse Spark 1.2 + Muse Code (coding agent)

  2. Cheapest tier: $0.20 per million output tokens

  3. Requires data sharing for training on lowest tier

  4. Muse Code designed to resume after crashes

  5. Meta competing on price, not top-end performance

  6. Benchmarks have a 'glaring gap' (unspecified)

  7. Meta released Muse Spark 1.2 with Muse Code coding agent

  8. Cheapest tier priced at $0.20 per million output tokens

  9. Requires data sharing for training on lowest-cost tier

  10. Agent feature: persistent state across crashes

  11. Strategy: competing on price and UX, not top-end performance

  12. Noted benchmark gap in the model

Go to the source

The Decoderthe-decoder.com

Publisher excerpt: Meta released Muse Spark 1.2 along with its own coding agent, Muse Code, which is designed to pick up exactly where it left off after a crash. The cheapest tier runs just 20 cents per million output tokens but requires users to share their data for training. Meta is competing on price, not top-end…
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore tools news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Tools