WorkThe story, in brief

IBM's Krishna tries to reassure investors that AI won't disrupt company's software unit

IBM's CEO just admitted what investors are really worried about: AI is eating the software business.

Paper-cut illustration of amber paths carrying capital toward a small coral research venture between larger buildings.
Capital and the next generation of AI ventures.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

IBM leadership is publicly acknowledging AI disruption risk to its legacy software unit while attempting damage control—a candid admission that the market is watching for signs of competitive vulnerability in traditional enterprise software.

The key facts

4 to know
  1. CEO Krishna statement: software will 'catch back up' within a year

  2. Mainframe hardware capacity highlighted as growth area

  3. Implicit admission of AI-driven software disruption concerns

  4. Investor reassurance context suggests market anxiety about IBM's software portfolio viability

Go to the source

CNBC Technologycnbc.com

Publisher excerpt: IBM's CEO highlighted growing mainframe hardware capacity, and said software should "catch back up" within a year.
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore work news

The wider picture

View all
Illustration of independent geometric mechanisms passing paper tasks along branching amber tracks.
AI illustration by KeyNews
Work01

The Emerging M&A Map For AI Agent Security

As agents move from pilots to production with real system access, enterprise security models are breaking. The M&A map is forming around who controls agent permissions, monitoring, and governance — a new class of identity management problem that practitioners need to architect for now.

Crunchbase News
Illustration of two anonymous hands arranging task cards around an amber tool on a shared desk.
AI illustration by KeyNews
Work02

AI privacy budgets: Ask for the calculation, not the claim

Enterprise AI buyers are accepting privacy budget numbers without verification. This deep dive explains what questions to ask vendors about federated learning privacy claims, and why the gap between contractual promises and operational evidence is where real exposure lives.

CIO
Illustration of two anonymous hands arranging task cards around an amber tool on a shared desk.
AI illustration by KeyNews
Work03

Andrew Kelley Interview: Why He Built Zig, Banned AI Contributions, and Moved Zig off GitHub

Open-source governance is shifting in response to AI-generated contributions. Zig's formal ban and migration off GitHub signals broader industry concern about code quality, maintainer burden, and the cultural impact of automated submissions — a flashpoint for how AI changes the work of software development.

InfoQ AI/ML