WorkThe story, in brief

Two-thirds of cyber threats still require manual resolution

Two-thirds of cyber threats still need humans. Here's why AI agents haven't closed the gap—yet.

Illustration of two anonymous hands arranging task cards around an amber tool on a shared desk.
People, judgement and the changing nature of work.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

Security teams remain bottlenecked on manual triage and alert resolution, revealing where agentic AI could reshape a profession—but hasn't yet at scale. A practitioner should track whether their vendor roadmap targets this workflow gap.

The key facts

8 to know
  1. Two-thirds of cyber threats require manual resolution

  2. Security teams spending majority of time on reactive alert triage

  3. Manual data gathering consuming team capacity

  4. Proactive threat hunting deprioritized due to reactive workload

  5. Published September 2026 — current state of security operations

  6. Security teams spending majority of time on reactive alert triage and manual data gathering

  7. Limited capacity left for proactive threat hunting

  8. Published Sep 2026 — recent data on agent adoption in security workflows

Go to the source

ITProitpro.com

Publisher excerpt: Security teams are spending most of their time on reactive alert triage and manual data gathering, with little left over for proactive threat hunting
Read original report
Back to today's editionMore work news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Work