WorkThe story, in brief

What happened after 2,000 people tried to hack my AI assistant

2,000 hackers tried to break an AI assistant. Here's what actually worked.

Paper-cut illustration of a coral software window opening into a three-dimensional drafting space.
New tools for building and creating with AI.AI illustration by KeyNews
The KeyNews take

Why it matters

Real-world adversarial testing of AI systems reveals practical security gaps that matter to anyone deploying agents in production. A crowdsourced red-teaming exercise exposes the gap between theoretical safety and deployed reality.

The key facts

10 to know
  1. 2,000 people participated in adversarial testing

  2. Published by Simon Willison (Datasette creator, AI safety researcher)

  3. Focuses on practical attack vectors and failure modes

  4. Empirical data on AI assistant robustness under real adversarial pressure

  5. Relevant to AI safety governance and production deployment risk

  6. 2,000 people participated in adversarial testing/hacking attempt

  7. Published by Simon Willison (prominent AI/web developer, known for AI safety commentary)

  8. Large-scale empirical data on AI assistant robustness and attack vectors

  9. Real-world security findings from deployed AI system

  10. Relevant to AI governance, safety testing, and responsible deployment

Go to the source

Simon Willisonsimonwillison.net

Read original report
Back to today's editionMore work news

Keep reading

Related stories

More from Work